Performance of an implantable automatic atrial fibrillation detection device: impact of software adjustments and relevance of manual episode analysis

AIMS Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) with specific atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithms (ILR-AF) have been developed for continuous AF monitoring. We sought to analyse the clinical value of a new AF monitoring device and to compare it to serial 7-day Holter. METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-four consecutive patients suffering from paroxysmal AF were included in this prospective analysis and received an ILR-AF. Manual electrogram analysis was performed for each automatically detected episode and each was categorized into one of three possible diagnoses: 'no AF', 'definite AF', and 'possible AF' (non-diagnostic). Analysis was performed separately before and after a software upgrade that was introduced during the course of the study. A subgroup of patients (51 of 64) underwent AF catheter ablation with subsequent serial 7-day Holter in comparison with the ILR-AF. A total of 333 interrogations were performed (203 before and 130 after software upgrade). The number of patients with AF misdetection was significantly reduced from 72 to 44% following the software upgrade (P = 0.001). The number of patients with non-diagnostic interrogations went from 38 to 16% (P = 0.001). Compared with serial 7-day Holter, the ILR-AF had a tendency to detect a higher number of patients with AF recurrences (31 vs. 24%; P = 0.125). CONCLUSIONS The rate of AF detection on ILR-AF may be higher compared with standard AF monitoring. However, false-positive AF recordings hamper the clinical value. Developments in device technology and device handling are necessary to minimize non-diagnostic interrogations.